v3 micro1 storyboard

V4 proposed client changes

Frame 23. The image of client space ship given replaces the space station from V3 storyboard.

Is this an approved final design? If we want to match cut the action from frame 22, I have created an image, that would be the closest “match cut” to the shape and action of frame 22.

Image 23-futuristic. The illustrative look is addressed in notes below.

Client sample. Image 23B

Since AI uses references for the most photo realistic images, the modern sleek approach appears to create more illustrative rendering versus more realistic. I experimented with many space stations, and they all rendered un realistic, illustrative results.

A more futuristic modern approach to frame 23 yields a more unreal illustration look,

Our original frame 23 space station to compare.

After experimenting with the proposed design in many variation, using different AI tools, it appears the space station will look a bit “AI” unreal, more like an illustration, if we go in a sleek futuristic look.

Exploring the futuristic space station, I believe because AI does not have realistic references to pull from its struggling to make something that looks real. This conclusion comes after trying different directions to achieve a realistic look, but it appears new direction of more modern and sleek will result in a more illustrative look.

Obviously we need to lock the space station in frame 23 before working on any other frames, 24,25,26,27,28 as these frames will be based on the locked image and shape in the final frame 23 image.

Should we go with the Client sample. For approval Image 23-futuristic. ?

Additional attempts to modernize frame 23 space station below, resulting in illustrative/ AI looks.